Opening Statement

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, over the upcoming days and weeks, I shall present a case to you that I would be thrilled to say is unusual. Or in the very least, rare. But, to my dismay, and frankly quite infuriating, it is not. In fact, this case displays the clearly nefarious, common practices of medical “professionals” in every facet of the US medical murder complex. Pharma and insurance whores, beholden to the almighty dollar, push chemicals they know full and well will cause harm and often permanent, even lethal, damage. Still others, are more concerned about reprimand that may come from state medical boards if they do not just go along with the killer profit program. Either way, these prostitutes shake their sleazy bare cheeks on every corner, in every city. Rare is the one or two that actually give a damn about humanity. There are likely few that would disagree with this opening statement, yet most will never mutter the same.

In the upcoming days and weeks, I will, by God’s grace, undoubtedly show that all involved with the destruction of my beloved, willingly chose to cause him harm, additional harm and irreparable damage that caused him great, needless suffering unto eventual death.

AND that this stands in stark contradiction to their oath, and reasonable expectation of the public, “first do no harm.”

AND will expose the plain and clear fact that the “standards of care”, in the very least, need changed to rightfully safeguard public health and interest against the profit-seeking whores.

What this is NOT

Over the course of this presentation, you will hear about treatments that are commonly considered “alternative”, “unconventional” or even “mythical”. The mainstream may have even brainwashed you enough to think of these therapies as “outdated”, or even “nonsense.” Although I could likely present a fabulous, convincing case against that lame propaganda, that is not what I am here to do. Rather than argue that traditional (more accurate classification) treatments are safer and more effective, that is not my point for citing them. The excruciatingly obvious point is simple: Just the fact that they exist at all. The fact that there are alternatives that these, and other, doctors could have–and should have–used (or at least allowed), and chose not to, is the point.

This presentation is also not aiming to provide all sorts of data, legalese and research regarding all that this entails. Frankly, I am sick and tired of doing everyone else’s job. Though I may note at times that there, for example, is research supporting such and such, go do your own homework. If you do, in fact, give a shit. My aim here is to merely present the case, so others that do care may build on it within their skills and expertise.

Another very important note before we proceed is the fact that I am not attempting to prove that Jamie would be alive right now had the docs done things differently. That would be absurd. Though we cannot know that definitely, we can derive from the facts of the case several things that are just as important. Mainly, what they chose to do did cause substantial harm, additional harm and needless suffering. And that they made those choices with full knowledge of these risks, and did not tell him. And thus, the likelihood that what they chose to do, caused him to die sooner. Furthermore, making clear how insane this was, is the plain fact that the vultures did have available non-invasive, gentle alternatives that they chose to not use or do, or even allow. And that led to undue suffering and an early death.

I am not an attorney, though am familiar with the laws and our Rights. I am not a medical professional, though am familiar with the care and basic design and functions of our bodies. Most importantly, I can, by God’s grace, think for myself. That said, now let us proceed.

Before we begin

Before we begin to dive into the cesspool of the vultures’ stew, out of respect to the readers here I need to caution you about some of the photos I will share. They are rather grotesque, but necessary for supporting evidence.

Please bear with me, as this will take much time. It’s not complicated, there is just so much here. Fact is, it is so clearly simple it’s stupid. The docs had gentle, effective alternatives, yet chose to do harm instead. Period.

Recap

As stated in the initial post, Summa/Akron (OH) Urology Nurse Postlewaite set the stage for Jamie’s decline when she and her student side-kick refused to do their damn job, May 14th, 2024. The main point here is, had Postlewaite simply informed him, “If you can’t pee more than a few tablespoons over the next couple hours, get your ass to the ER immediately.”, he would not have declined as he did. He would not have come so close to death May 17th.

Postlewaite’s obscene, intentional negligence gave way to landing Jamie in the hell-spital (hospital) June 6th to the 24th. That provided opportunity for docs to pump him full of poisons. Then enter Dr. Rupesh Raina with the kill shot. Kidney doc from Americare Kidney Institute LLC, Akron Ohio.

Since already I hammered the nail on the incompetence of the ER staff on April 25th, we’ll leave that aside for now. Except to highlight that at that first contact, Jamie was not incapacitated. He did require immediate, careful attention, but not the urgent, no holds barred brutality that he suffered.

Keep in mind that between his release from the hell-spital April 29th, and the void trial May 14th, Jamie was active, eating well, doing yard work, working long days, helping his parents, working out…. Enjoying life with minimal adjustments. Furthermore, he was gaining weight and all his numbers (blood work) were going in the right directions. He was already improving. Also important to keep in mind is that tumor stopped growing. The swelling subsided. The traditional therapies from the naturopath were already noticeably effective. Again, all prior to May 14th, 2024.

In a few weeks, he went from “acute kidney injury” (April 25th) to “renal failure” (June 6th). The only determining factor was Nurse Postlewaite.

KEEP IN MIND
at every step, they all had common sense Alternatives
that were:
-non-invasive
-would cause no harm
-potentially much more effective
-NOT outside the scope of their capabilities

First up: Void Trial

Of course, Nurse Postlewaite transcribed in the notes (found in Jamie’s chart) her account of that appointment much differently. Rather than waste more time on her than due, let’s focus on where she stated that she did discuss and explain all necessary points. Although there are many things written there that displays what a full of shit liar she is, the two statements most pertinent are:

Rebuttal 1: Jamie stated that he would like to be able to void on his own. Of course that was his ultimate goal. He said this in response to the gory details she went on about “chronic catheter” options. At that time we both asked her about time, amounts, and whatnot. All she said was, “Well, we’re here here til four every day. So any day after office hours, you can go to the ER.” Then stared blankly, and went on again (3rd time) about the Flomax. When I mentioned that the Flomax can harm kidneys, she literally chuckled. These were the only “instructions” given and you can see they were quite vague.

Rebuttal 2: Again, had the moron said at least that much Jamie would not have almost died May 17th. At NO POINT during the entire less than ten minute “conversation” did she state anything in regard to time, amounts, signs of danger, etc.

So, why should you believe our account over an “educated” nurse? Glad you asked.

• Let’s first address the elephant. Plain common sense. Any reasonable person would get to at least “2pm” and say, “Well, shit. I still can’t pee. I better call the office or go to the ER, like the nurse said.”, if those instructions were in fact given. It is reasonable to believe that no one would blow off detailed instructions, knowing that it could literally kill them.
• Jamie was much more than a reasonable-minded person. He was a medical professional with a Master’s. Granted, his speciality was orthopedics, not urology, but suffice to say he took such matters seriously. Especially considering the fact that he knew his Creatinine was already high (*which means the nurse also knew). Though it had gone down a bit, it was still tedious. The smallest increase could prove horrific. He knew that. The nurse knew that. Point is, he would not have brushed off such detailed instructions, had she in fact given them. Bottom line is, she did not.
• Furthermore, ask anyone that knew Jamie. He was focused, responsible, dependable and always careful in following instructions of such serious matters.
• More? He already had a long, proven history of taking great care of his body. And he was improving. Why would he blow off clear instructions critical to his health and conquering the issues at hand?
• Which person in this scenario had anything to lose or gain by lying?

All things considered, Nurse Bitch-Ass is a liar, at best. This is easily deduced using common sense for simple comparison of the two people involved. And, since I am presenting the facts as a first-hand witness, have at it if you’d like to question my integrity. I’m ready. The point is, it is simple common sense. Furthermore, providing a simple pamphlet with such details would have covered her ass, whether she lied or not.

Again, had he been given clear instructions he would have followed them. Had that been the case, we would have been back in the ER at least by that evening or sooner. Thus, he would not have almost died May 17th. Thus, he would have had opportunity to continue to improve. Period. I am not a skilled mathematician, but all that adds up.

Now, look carefully at the following charts. Each contains historic information of Jamie’s blood work, particularly the shit that can kill a person if left too high for too long. Keep mindful of the fact that Nurse Bitch-Ass had this information at her fingertips that morning. The two most pertinent to our focus at this point are Creatinine and Urea Nitrogen (BUN).

If you look closely, you will see that in both charts the numbers were initially falling, as they should. At the time of the void trial, though still high, it is clear that his body was trying to improve. Then just after May 14th the numbers sky-rocketed and lingered there for a bit.

And to remind you, here are notes from April 28th, just after the draining and inserting the ureteral stents. His prognosis was clearly optimistic.

See that? “Progressing. Progressing. Progressing.” Check out the very last line: “Low risk of patient condition declining or worsening.” At the very critical moment, as my husband was “progressing”, yet “moderately stable”, but determined likely to recover from “acute kidney injury”, Postlewaite and the student nurse filled Jamie full of barely warm tap water, pulled out the catheter and sent him away with no clear instructions. That created circumstances that almost killed him. Though it is reasonable to believe they had this information, still in less than one half hour they set him up to suffer horribly and die.

Some may be asking why Jamie did not just take it upon himself and head to the ER at least by that evening (May 14th), or even the next day, anyway. Recall, I mentioned in the previous post two things on that. The biggest reason is that he truly did not feel awful at all. Sure, he was a bit uncomfortable and tired. Sure, he was not urinating cups at a time. He assumed that was normal, considering the damage and even normal swelling. Otherwise, he had no fever, sharp pains or anything to warn that it was more critical. That is, until the late night of May 16th, which is why early that Friday morning (17th) we went straight to the ER. Again, I must stress that had he been provided clear instruction to return that day (May 14th), he most certainly would have.

The bottom line is, she did not provide clear instructions and he almost died. Period. In summary, these nurses refused to do their jobs in accordance with industry standards. How is that not in violation of “standards of care”?

Anywhere else, if someone refuses to do their job, they get fired. If their lunacy results in harm to another, they get prosecuted and sued. It is not unreasonable to expect a urology nurse to do her job and provide clear instructions. However, the “standards of care”, as laid out by Ohio law governing malpractice actions, were somehow “not violated” by these nurses’ refusal to do their damn jobs, in spite of the fact that they almost killed my husband.

The public has a reasonable expectation to believe practitioners will not knowingly cause them harm. In this part, harm was caused because the nurses did not do their jobs with care and within industry standards (including not providing clear instructions). It is further not unreasonable to believe that they would have known the serious implications of their refusal to do their damn jobs. But let’s move along.

Catch 22 from Hell

To save time here, go for a recap of this phase at the previous post, where on June 6th we were faced with the deadly decision to have Jamie admitted. He collapsed in the bathroom early that morning. We were in a catch 22 from hell. Still, there was reasonable expectation that the medical professionals would tend to him in a manner that would “first cause no harm.” Yet every f*ing thing they did, caused him harm, additional harm, needless suffering and serious damages. All, in spite of the fact that they had available, more gentle alternatives that would have proven more effective. Or, in the very least, would not have killed him.

So, he was admitted June 6th and kept in that hell-spital until June 24th. That deserves its own post, so we do not end up with a three hour read here. But let me leave you with this… The photo below was taken May 20th. Though unsettling, it had barely barely started to break through the skin at that point. When you later see pictures taken after the June hell-spital stay, you will see clearly that the kill shot prescribed by Dr. Raina did exactly what the Epogen website said it would. But for now, this is what the tumor looked like before he was given that and other poisons.

At this point, I’ll call a recess and let all this sink in for now.

To whom much is given, much is required. Luke 12:48